After teaching for two years, I have come to two conclusions (specifically about the Secondary system, as I'm fairly ignorant about how the Primary system works). 1 - The education system runs in two separate ways. The first being how the teachers actually run it, and the second is how the Ministry wants it to be run. 2 - The Ministry is full of idiotic personel who create jobs for themselves by giving traditional teaching methods new names, and packaging them as "revolutionary". Now, while these conclusions may not seem all that novel to some (and perhaps even to me), there are a few new conclusions I have reached as a result of these two, which I will come to in a moment.
Before I shed light on this new epiphany, I must say that, after having taught for about two years now in Canada's public education system, I can honestly say that I believe there are few jobs I would enjoy more than teaching. The secondary school sytem in Canada, while being funded by bureaucrats in the Ministry of Education, is built on the backs of teachers; teachers with a common goal, and fueled by common sense. And as a society, we should be grateful for this. Grateful that there are people out there with enough sense to ignore the passing fancies of an ignorant bureacracy. Harsh words, perhaps, but one must really be a part of the system in order to truly understand the depths of stupidity achieved by this particular administration.
Unlike what they would have you believe, teaching has not changed much in the past thousand years or so. Teachers teach, and students learn; in all honesty, that's all there really is to it. There's no "trick" to it, despite what some might have you believe. Anyone can do it, as long as they have the necessary knowledge, and they have the ability to control a class of 30 children. The only true difference between a good teacher and a bad teacher is that a good teacher cares about the success of his/her students, and a bad one doesn't. A bad teacher is not defined by their "teaching style or method", and a good teacher is not defined by following Ministry guidelines and curriculum, and being able to incorporate Ministry buzzwords into their job interviews (the latest being "differentiated instruction" and "implementation of IEPs" and "student success"). In fact, for those in the business, it's worth noting that the most effective teachers, the older, more experienced teahcer, will NEVER buy into what the Ministry sells. EVER. These teachers have seen it all, have done it all, have tried it all, and have always gone back to what has worked, which is whatever works for them. Unlike what Ministry lapdogs will tell you, there is no right and wrong way to teach. There are no fundamental skills that you need in order to be able to teach. Even wild animals, who do not have the cognitive capacity to logically solve problems, still manage to teach their offspring, and their offspring, who are equally unevolved, are able to learn.
This brings me to my next revelation, and that is, while the Ministry of Education hass clearly been selling sour milk for a while now, it's only the young, inexperienced teachers who are dumb enough to buy it. Much like inexperienced travellers in foreign countries who get fleeced by local vendors because they are unaware of the local market, young, inexperienced teachers often get "brainwashed" into believing that there is a right and a wrong way to teach. This was made abundantly clear to me after another session of "Professional Development", hearing about young new teachers playing psychologist, and Ministry lapdogs spewing buzz lingo.
While the sessions was specifically for "new teachers", it was presented entirely by persons under the age of 35. How could a person of the age of 35 possibly have enough experience to reveal the truth of the business to a crop of equally inexperienced teachers? For those new teachers out there who are wondering why they never see teachers over the age of 45 doing a "Professional Development" presentation on new Ministry mandates, here's a hint: they're not that dumb.
Which brings me to my next revelation. I've always wondered why the Ministry never hires experienced teachers (and when I say experience, I mean a minimum of 10-15+ years) into positions of influence, the general public might learn the horrible truth; that teaching isn't that complicated. Now, this is not saying that it doesn't take a "special" person to teach, because it does, and this isn't saying that teaching isn't a difficult job, because it is. However, I'll be the first (amongst hopefully many) that will tell you that teaching is not rocket science. Now, you ask, "What would happen if this terrible, dark secret ever got out?" Simple; the hundreds of Ministry created positions to address progressive teaching would be defunct. And in case you're thinking that I'm a backward thinking traditionalist, this couldn't be further from the truth. I understand that these people truly believe that they are forward thinking, and are constantly trying to improve our practice. However, they are trying to improve on a practice that has been established for thousands of years. It's something akin to trying to improve a tire by making small improvements here or there in it's SHAPE. Every time they spend hundreds of millions of dollars to "try something out", only to find that the original way worked better every time.
So what can we conclude about this age-old conflict of head versus wall? There are two conclusions we can reach from this sort of behaviour. The first is that they are cunning, evil, avaricious bastards who are creating a market to support their own financial gain. The other is to conclude that they are making well-intentioned, but childish, ignorant, artless, and inept attempts at improving something they know very little about, and are too obtuse to find out anything about it. They are the only two logical conclusions one can draw when seeing this kind of behaviour. If one were to see two people about, one running into a brick wall again and again, and the other standing there laughing, there are only two conclusions one could draw about the one standing there laughing. Either he's really callous and mean, or he's just as dumb as the one crashing into the wall.
I prefer the latter, because I truly believe these government lackeys truly have the best of intentions. That leads me to my final revelation. The singular truth about the Ministry and their initiatives and mandates. While it has become abundantly clear that the Ministry has no clue as to how to properly run the education system, I have come to the conclusion that they cannot be held at fault for the many poor decisions they have made in the past. How can this be, you ask? Think about this: A dog cannot be blamed for it's actions, such as biting in self defence, or barking when the doorbell rings. It's just a dog. We cannot expect the dog to understand logical thinking processes because it is well beyond it's cognitive means; it is impossible. By the same token, the Ministry cannot be held repsonsible for it's mandates. Understanding what truly goes on in the Education system is simply impossible for people so far removed from it. Much like a dog will growl, bark, and bite in self defense when threatened in a corner, the Ministry is simply making reactive actions based on public appeal, political philosophy, and positive intent. There is no malice behind their idiocy. They are not actively trying to destroy the Canadian education system. This is simply a case of what happens when people who are not sufficiently intelligent nor qualified get into a position to make decisions which affect the whole.
Still don't understand? Think of it this way. There are hundreds of thousands of "average Joe" sports fans out there possessing an average intelligence, and an average understanding of their particular game. Each one of them is an "armchair GM", believing that they could do a good job of creating a winning team. However, they are so far removed from the game (that is, they do not actively play the game at any marketably competitive level, they have never been involved with the professional side of the game, and do not possess an understanding of the game deep
enough to warrant making a decision which could affect the future of a big market club), that allowing them to make the kinds of decisions that would affect the success and future of the club would surely be suicidal. No proper owner in their right mind would ever allow one of these "average Joe armchair GMs" to make a decision which could affect their club at a critical level... yet these decisions are made every day. Every day, there are "average Joe armchair GMs" who possess neither the intelligence nor the understanding to make critical decisions, yet make them
day in and day out.
Wesley Snipes (aka "Blade") said it best. "Some motha-fuckas always tryin to skate uphill". Instead of actually testing their methods out in a controlled, scientific environment, the Ministry spends billions of taxpayer dollars trying out new initiatives, and when they realize that they don't work, move on to the next big thing. And, of course, the ironic thing is, they must be held blameless. Would you blame a dog for being a dog? No. Then why would you blame an idiot for being an idiot. Ignorance, in this country at least, is not a crime. Whether we can cast blame for remaining willfully ignorant is another story. It's the difference between blaming them for bumping into furniture in the dark, or blaming them for not having the wherewithal to turn on the light.
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Thursday, February 14, 2008
JFJ
For those of you outside of "Leaf Nation" (again, I refer to "Leaf Nation" as the geographical area defined by television broadcast coverage), you may not be as familiar or well acquainted with good 'ol John Ferguson Jr. "JFJ", as they call him, has just recently been hired by TSN (my beloved sports network) as a guest analyst. Now, I love TSN. Really, I do. But some of their recent broadcaster acquisitions have me shaking my head. They started off their run of guest panelists with the "loveable" Tie Domi, former enforcer of the Maple Leafs. Yes, good idea. Let's ask a meathead enforcer what he thinks about hockey, because we know he's way up there in hockey IQ with Brian Burke and Bob McKenzie. Okay, so that didn't work out so well. Well, let's try our hand with another complete bonehead in Mike Milbury. Yes, the same Mike Milbury who made possibly some of the worst deals in NHL history. Let's ask him what he thinks about hockey, because he's clearly right up there with Tie Domi. Okay, so those first two haven't worked out quite so well. Hey, I've got a great idea! Let's hire John Ferguson Jr. The ex-GM of the Toronto Maple Leafs. Now, if you get fired as a GM from a hockey team, that's a pretty good indication that you're not doing a very good job, but if you get fired as the GM of the Toronto Maple Leafs, good GOD, stop what you're doing right now and try something else, because you clearly don't have the aptitude for this job. Now, I'm not saying that JFJ doesn't know anything about hockey, I'm just saying that he took a bad team, and made it even worse. Whether or not he knows anything about hockey, I'll leave that for you to decide. Incidentally, not only did he leave the team in shambles, but he gave half the guys he signed gigantic contracts, and then gave them No-Trade clauses so that they couldn't be moved. Just something to consider...
Now, as if hiring this dumbass as a guest analyist on the TSN panel wasn't enough, Hockey Canada, for reasons beyond me, have gone out and hired this guy as a scout for the 2010 team. Wait wait wait... Just a sec... Isn't this the same guy that gave Bryan McCabe a 7 million dollar long-term deal? Isn't this the same guy that's paying Pavel Kubina 4.5 million dollars a season? Isn't this the same guy that gave No-Trade clauses to all of his moveable assets, making it an uphill battle to acquire any kind of prospect or draft pick? Isn't this the same guy who's done absolutely nothing right since he became GM in 2003? Hm.. Maybe I'm thinking of a different John Ferguson Jr. Granted that he was left twisting in the wind by MLSE, made the fall guy of the entire franchise, and was finally fired after what seemed an eternity of inane bureacratic filibustering. Granted that, and feel sorry for him if you must, but he still didn't do a good job, and he still doesn't know anything about hockey. Please, if there's anyone from TSN or Hockey Canada reading this, please, please stop the insanity. This man has done nothing to merit his selection as a scout for Team Canada, and he has done or said nothing remotely intelligent to make anyone believe we should listen to what he thinks. He was brought on board the TSN panel to give a frank and unbiased GM's opinion about the trade deadline. What did he have to say? He said that if he was still in charge, the For Sale sign would be out, and that the Leafs need to recognize their opportunity and make a move, and that (quote):
I was preparing and making calls for six to eight weeks before January 22 when I was let go. Those discussions were well under way. You had to have that plan in place and we did.
That quote was directly from the TSN website (tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=229652&hubname=nhl) folks. There hasn't been any embellishment. He actually said that. Okay, so we know he can state the blatantly obvious. Is there anything else he does well? Until he proves otherwise, I'm going to go ahead and say, "No".
Now, as if hiring this dumbass as a guest analyist on the TSN panel wasn't enough, Hockey Canada, for reasons beyond me, have gone out and hired this guy as a scout for the 2010 team. Wait wait wait... Just a sec... Isn't this the same guy that gave Bryan McCabe a 7 million dollar long-term deal? Isn't this the same guy that's paying Pavel Kubina 4.5 million dollars a season? Isn't this the same guy that gave No-Trade clauses to all of his moveable assets, making it an uphill battle to acquire any kind of prospect or draft pick? Isn't this the same guy who's done absolutely nothing right since he became GM in 2003? Hm.. Maybe I'm thinking of a different John Ferguson Jr. Granted that he was left twisting in the wind by MLSE, made the fall guy of the entire franchise, and was finally fired after what seemed an eternity of inane bureacratic filibustering. Granted that, and feel sorry for him if you must, but he still didn't do a good job, and he still doesn't know anything about hockey. Please, if there's anyone from TSN or Hockey Canada reading this, please, please stop the insanity. This man has done nothing to merit his selection as a scout for Team Canada, and he has done or said nothing remotely intelligent to make anyone believe we should listen to what he thinks. He was brought on board the TSN panel to give a frank and unbiased GM's opinion about the trade deadline. What did he have to say? He said that if he was still in charge, the For Sale sign would be out, and that the Leafs need to recognize their opportunity and make a move, and that (quote):
I was preparing and making calls for six to eight weeks before January 22 when I was let go. Those discussions were well under way. You had to have that plan in place and we did.
That quote was directly from the TSN website (tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=229652&hubname=nhl) folks. There hasn't been any embellishment. He actually said that. Okay, so we know he can state the blatantly obvious. Is there anything else he does well? Until he proves otherwise, I'm going to go ahead and say, "No".
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Vancouver 2010 Part III - Notable Omissions
There were a number of notable omissions that were left of either list. Here they are:
Todd Bertuzzi - About five years ago, Todd Bertuzzi was the premier powerfoward in the NHL. That was pre-Steve Moore. Post-Steve Moore, Bertuzzi has been a shadow of his former self. Whether it’s because he can’t bring himself to play physically anymore, or whether it’s because he hasn’t forgiven himself, or whether it’s because he can’t deal with the scrutiny of the crowds, or for whatever reason, Todd Bertuzzi simply isn’t the player he once was. That being said, this year has been a bit of a breakthrough for Bertuzzi, scoring 11 goals and 29 points in 43 games, with a +5 rating and 43 PIMS. Perhaps Bertuzzi is over the psychological hump that has dogged him post-Moore. If Bertuzzi can get his confidence back, and play like he played pre-Moore, he is, and will be a force to be reckoned with.
Mike Cammelleri - While having the potential to become a prolific goal scorer in the NHL, he’s not there yet. Also, compared to vast talent that Canada has to choose from, Cammelleri, like Kariya, becomes more of a one dimensional player. If Cammelleri can consistently light it up for the next two years until the tournament, he may have an outside chance of making the cut.
Corey Perry - Corey Perry has experienced a breakout season playing alongside former Canadian Junior team mate, Ryan Getzlaf. Perry, by himself, brings a very unique skill set to an international tournament such as this. Known to have agitating qualities, Corey Perry also possesses great puck control skills, creativity, vision, and offensive acumen. However, there are other, more skilled players that can fill the role of Corey Perry, and do the things he does well, but better. If Corey Perry makes the team, it is his agitating qualities that will set him apart. His ability to rile up the opposition and utilize his offensive cunning is a unique combination that very few players possess. If he can consistently, and effectively combine these traits for the next two years until the tournament, he might just have a chance of making the cut.
Jonathan Cheechoo - After Cheechoo’s magical 05/06 year winning the Rocket Richard trophy, things have gone downhill. The following year, Cheechoo only scored 37 goals and 69 points in 76 games, and this year, has an abysmal 11 goals and 18 points in 45 games. Whether or not Cheechoo is a one-hit wonder remains to be seen, but for the moment, and for Sharks fans, it’s not looking good.
Patrick Marleau - Marleau moves quick for a big man, has a great release, and quarterbacks his team’s powerplay. However, for a big man, Marleau under-uses his size which could be a tremendous asset in opening up the ice, and could probably stand to shoot the puck with more frequency. Marleau has also struggled with consistency issues, being somewhat of a streaky player at times. All these things would spell disaster in a short, single-elimination tournament like the Olympics, and unless Marleau can vastly improve his overall value, Canadian brass will more than likely pass him over.
Kris Draper - Draper’s checking presence on his club team has helped the Wings become a dominant force over the years. His checking presence in the 2004 World Cup alongside Joe Thornton and Shane Doan dominated the tournament, both defensively and offensively. However, his presence in the 2006 Olympic tournament went largely unnoticed. I was actually shocked when he was selected for the 2006 tournament, and not just in retrospect, because for anyone who knows their game, they should know that checking becomes considerably more difficult on the larger ice surface. Checking is all about taking away time and space, and when given more space, skilled players can create their own time, while manufacturing more space for their team. Kris Draper, although highly effective on NHL sized ice, is a role player, and one whose effectiveness is diluted on the big ice surface. I like Kris Draper, the leadership and attitude he brings to a team, his willingness to accept his role, and the skill set he brings. However, I believe it was a mistake to select Draper for the 2006 Olympic tournament, and I believe it will be another mistake to select him for 2010. This is not because I don’t like Draper and the package he brings, nor is because I have no respect for what Draper brings to a team. It is simply because Team Canada is a team with very limited roster spots, and Canadian brass cannot afford to fill those valuable spots with role players, especially ones with as many limitations as a player like Draper.
Mike Fisher - Mike Fisher is in a very similar situation to Kris Draper. Despite his tenacious forechecking ability and two-way play, it's simply impossible to take a player like Fisher. His play is more suited to the smaller ice surface (much like players like Morrow, Draper, and Doan), he doesn't possess the skill of a Getzlaf or Nash, and in the end, as much as I like what Fisher brings to the table (and I do, being a big Sens fan), he's just not good enough.
Todd Bertuzzi - About five years ago, Todd Bertuzzi was the premier powerfoward in the NHL. That was pre-Steve Moore. Post-Steve Moore, Bertuzzi has been a shadow of his former self. Whether it’s because he can’t bring himself to play physically anymore, or whether it’s because he hasn’t forgiven himself, or whether it’s because he can’t deal with the scrutiny of the crowds, or for whatever reason, Todd Bertuzzi simply isn’t the player he once was. That being said, this year has been a bit of a breakthrough for Bertuzzi, scoring 11 goals and 29 points in 43 games, with a +5 rating and 43 PIMS. Perhaps Bertuzzi is over the psychological hump that has dogged him post-Moore. If Bertuzzi can get his confidence back, and play like he played pre-Moore, he is, and will be a force to be reckoned with.
Mike Cammelleri - While having the potential to become a prolific goal scorer in the NHL, he’s not there yet. Also, compared to vast talent that Canada has to choose from, Cammelleri, like Kariya, becomes more of a one dimensional player. If Cammelleri can consistently light it up for the next two years until the tournament, he may have an outside chance of making the cut.
Corey Perry - Corey Perry has experienced a breakout season playing alongside former Canadian Junior team mate, Ryan Getzlaf. Perry, by himself, brings a very unique skill set to an international tournament such as this. Known to have agitating qualities, Corey Perry also possesses great puck control skills, creativity, vision, and offensive acumen. However, there are other, more skilled players that can fill the role of Corey Perry, and do the things he does well, but better. If Corey Perry makes the team, it is his agitating qualities that will set him apart. His ability to rile up the opposition and utilize his offensive cunning is a unique combination that very few players possess. If he can consistently, and effectively combine these traits for the next two years until the tournament, he might just have a chance of making the cut.
Jonathan Cheechoo - After Cheechoo’s magical 05/06 year winning the Rocket Richard trophy, things have gone downhill. The following year, Cheechoo only scored 37 goals and 69 points in 76 games, and this year, has an abysmal 11 goals and 18 points in 45 games. Whether or not Cheechoo is a one-hit wonder remains to be seen, but for the moment, and for Sharks fans, it’s not looking good.
Patrick Marleau - Marleau moves quick for a big man, has a great release, and quarterbacks his team’s powerplay. However, for a big man, Marleau under-uses his size which could be a tremendous asset in opening up the ice, and could probably stand to shoot the puck with more frequency. Marleau has also struggled with consistency issues, being somewhat of a streaky player at times. All these things would spell disaster in a short, single-elimination tournament like the Olympics, and unless Marleau can vastly improve his overall value, Canadian brass will more than likely pass him over.
Kris Draper - Draper’s checking presence on his club team has helped the Wings become a dominant force over the years. His checking presence in the 2004 World Cup alongside Joe Thornton and Shane Doan dominated the tournament, both defensively and offensively. However, his presence in the 2006 Olympic tournament went largely unnoticed. I was actually shocked when he was selected for the 2006 tournament, and not just in retrospect, because for anyone who knows their game, they should know that checking becomes considerably more difficult on the larger ice surface. Checking is all about taking away time and space, and when given more space, skilled players can create their own time, while manufacturing more space for their team. Kris Draper, although highly effective on NHL sized ice, is a role player, and one whose effectiveness is diluted on the big ice surface. I like Kris Draper, the leadership and attitude he brings to a team, his willingness to accept his role, and the skill set he brings. However, I believe it was a mistake to select Draper for the 2006 Olympic tournament, and I believe it will be another mistake to select him for 2010. This is not because I don’t like Draper and the package he brings, nor is because I have no respect for what Draper brings to a team. It is simply because Team Canada is a team with very limited roster spots, and Canadian brass cannot afford to fill those valuable spots with role players, especially ones with as many limitations as a player like Draper.
Mike Fisher - Mike Fisher is in a very similar situation to Kris Draper. Despite his tenacious forechecking ability and two-way play, it's simply impossible to take a player like Fisher. His play is more suited to the smaller ice surface (much like players like Morrow, Draper, and Doan), he doesn't possess the skill of a Getzlaf or Nash, and in the end, as much as I like what Fisher brings to the table (and I do, being a big Sens fan), he's just not good enough.
Friday, February 8, 2008
Vancouver 2010 Part II - The Cuts
The Cuts:
Now for the players I took a pass on. Naturally, a strong argument can be made for any of these players; some of them people will undoubtedly wonder why they're even on my list, and for those absent, some will wonder why they didn't make the short-list. Here is my short-list of bubble players who didn't make the cut.
Daniel Briere - Briere is quick, shifty, and has the soft hands of a sniper. He is equally adept at setting up plays as finishing them, and can play under intense pressure situations. Defensively he's not a liability, offensively dangerous; on the big ice surface, his agility would be a welcome addition to Team Canada’s offence. However, while Daniel Briere brings with him an impressive skill set, each of the bubble players I’ve chosen fills a particular niche within the team. Nash brings his unbelievable stick skills and foot speed, Gagne with his speed and two-way savvy, Staal with his all-around ability, decision making, and net presence, Getzlaf with his poise, patience, and balanced play, and Spezza with his unparalleled passing and puck movement skills. While Briere is a considerable threat on offence, he is simply not able to fill those gaps to the level that these other players can.
Marc Savard - While Savard is an excellent playmaker, and prolific point getter, like Briere, there is simply no room for the skill set he brings. His skating is not as strong as Gagne or Nash, his playmaking ability is not up to the level of a Spezza, Crosby, or Thornton, and he doesn’t provide the big body presence, poise, and savvy of a Getzlaf or Gagne. While he is an invaluable asset to his club team, there is simply no room on a team as tight as Canada.
Mike Richards - Two years might seem like a country mile from here, because in that time, it might very well be impossible to cut Richards from the team. In his young career, Richards has captained the Canadian Junior team to a gold medal, brought his Junior club, the Kitchener Rangers success in the playoffs, and has quickly become an integral part of his NHL club, the Philadelphia Flyers. Seeing Mike Richards play reminds me a lot of another monstrous player for Sweden that you might recognize: Daniel Alfredsson. Richards displays plenty of poise, two-way savvy, and like the aforementioned Alfredsson, his feet never stop moving. He is currently on par to eclipse his previous season highs, and he has been referred to with reference as the future captain of his NHL club. Whether in the coming seasons he separates himself from the rest of the pack is something only time will tell, and he is certainly a case that will have to be revisited in the 09/10 season.
Brendan Shanahan - Brendan Shanahan has had immense success, both at the NHL level as well as the international level. His previous involvements with Team Canada have all been successful, and the skill set and leadership he brings to any team would be valuable indeed. However, this is no ordinary team, and these are no ordinary players. While Shanahan is still effective in the offensive zone, his skating has never really been his strongest asset, and on the big ice, strong skaters are essential to a winning team. In 2010, Shanahan will be pushing 40 years, and with the combination of age, skating ability, and his skill set, it would be impossible to fit him within the structure of the team. Shanahan, you will be missed!
Rod Brind'Amour - Yes, I had “Rod the Bod” on my short-list. Most pundits, websites, and armchair hockey fans wouldn’t even mention his name on a list as “prestigious” as the one Canadian brass looks at. However, there are a number of reasons why I think Rod Brind’Amour should at least draw significant consideration. Brind’Amour is a born leader, both vocally and by example, his faceoff skills are impressive, and he is a warrior through and through. Aside from Adam Foote, there is no player who exhibits the toughness, both physical and mental, that Rod Brind’Amour does. While he is not the fleetest of foot, or the best puck mover in the league, he is solid in both ends of the rink, an invaluable penalty killer, he is consistently effective in the faceoff circle, he has been consistently productive for the last three seasons (including this one), and his play without the puck is probably as strong or stronger than his play with the puck. However, when looking at the skill and skating level of some of the names that were taken (and even some of the names that weren’t), there just simply isn't any room for Brind'Amour and his unique skill set.
Paul Kariya - Paul Kariya, like Rod Brind’Amour, brings a very valuable and very unique skill set to his team. He’s experienced success, both internationally and in the NHL (although he hasn’t won a Cup yet), and brings with him a positive attitude and leadership skills. His experiences with Team Canada have been productive, and in the 2002 Olympic tournament, generated many quality scoring chances with his blazing speed, bullet shot, and adept finishing skills. Unfortunately, the speedy Kariya can be a one dimensional player at times, and while his foot speed will serve him and his team well on the big ice surface, he can’t open that ice up as well as players like Staal, Thornton, or Heatley. His finishing skills are admirable, but are not equalled by his passing, and many players like Getzlaf, Staal, and others present more of a balanced package, which can keep goalies a little more on their toes. While I would like nothing more than to select Kariya (if anything to represent the Asian population), he simply isn’t good enough to make the cut. And that is not a knock against Kariya, that says something about the amount of skill available to this team.
Jonathan Toews - Toews has a bright future ahead of him in the NHL, but as of now, is only in his rookie season. Even Sidney Crosby was passed over for selection in the 2006 Winter Games, and Toews, while holding vast potential, is no Sidney Crosby. There are still two years left before the 2010 games, and that may be time enough for Toews to prove his worth, but one look at the talent available for selection, and becomes abundantly clear just how high of a mountain he needs to climb. Be that as it may, he is certainly a case that will need to be revisited in two years in 2010. Best of luck, Jonathan Toews.
Shane Doan - “Doaner” as he’s known, brings another unique blend of checking, scoring, and physical presence to the team. In the 2004 world cup, he played alongside Joe Thornton and Kris Draper on a “checking line” which dominated the tournament. However, as much as I like the game that Shane Doan plays, and the skill set that he represents, unlike Ryan Getzlaf, I don’t believe it’s a skill set that will translate well onto the bigger ice surface. While both are very physical players who display two-way savvy, Getzlaf’s poise, patience, and natural flair for playing in the middle are all translatable to the larger ice surface, while Doan’s run and gun style and tight checking are more conducive to a smaller surface. It would be fun to watch how Doan adapts to the larger ice surface, but that is a luxury that these kinds of tournaments do not afford.
Brenden Morrow - Brenden Morrow brings a very similar skill set to that of Shane Doan; a physical, run-and-gun, two-way playing style which can dominate the smaller ice surface, and check opponents into the ground. Unfortunately, like Doan, this style suffers from the same drawbacks, as checking opponents becomes more difficult, particularly when speedy, puck moving forwards are given larger areas to work with. Cutting out time and space becomes more difficult, and that is a keystone to Morrow’s game; forcing offensive zone turnovers and opportunistic play.
Dan Boyle - Last of the “big 4” for Tampa Bay, Dan Boyle is slick and fast. He can make clean, crisp outlet passes, rush the puck, and quarterback the powerplay. Boyle has developed into a very balanced defenceman for both Canada and his NHL club, making him a very difficult cut. His style of play lends itself nicely to the big ice surface, but he lacks the size and international experience of other bubble players like Jovanovski and Bouwmeester. However, Boyle’s leadership qualities, foot speed, tight defensive zone coverage, ability to quickly and effectively move the puck out of the danger zones, and transition offence would be a welcome addition to the team. Boyle's direct competition would be Brian Campbell and Ed Jovanovski, who may very well be interchangeable on the team.
Rob Blake - Age has become a factor with Rob Blake, as he is just too slow. Being a “complete package” defenceman means relying heavily on skating and positioning as cornerstones of his game; both of which have never really been Blake’s strongest assets. In his younger years, he could rely a little heavier on his foot speed to get himself out of trouble, but now with the onset of age, he is a step slower, and doesn’t have that impeccable positioning to keep him out of trouble, nor the foot speed to give him the recuperative ability get him out of trouble when he gets in deep. His body is not as well conditioned as Foote or Brind’Amour, so playing into his 40’s is going to be a problem, and in short, despite his vast experience and success internationally and in the NHL, his swan song has sung, and his boat has left. Thanks for the many great years, Mr. Blake, you will be missed!
Brian Campbell - If "slickness" was a trait, Brian Campbell's got it in spades. His ability to move the puck on the powerplay and confidence with the puck are difficult to match, and he carries with him a penchant for open ice hits (apropos R.J. Umberger of the Flyers in the 05/06 playoffs and others). Unfortunately, while Campbell possesses a most desireable skill set, I had to reject Campbell for mostly the same reasons as I rejected Boyle. While he is able to do a number of things very well, there a number of Canadian defenseman who can do the same things he can do, but do them better. And while he can run the powerplay with aplomb, significantly better than a d-man like Phillips, Phillips is far tighter on the defensive zone coverage, is more physical in the defensive zone, has better recuperative ability, and makes cleaner and smarter outlet passes.
Shawn Horcoff - I know many people would not even consider Horcoff for the Canadian Olympic national team. Some of you might think that I'm adding his name on my short list just because he was selected for the All-Star team. Not so. For anyone who's seen this guy develop, they know that Horcoff brings much more to the Oilers than just being a first-line centre. The argument could be made that Horcoff doesn't have the skill to be a true top-line centre, and that argument might be justified. He doesn't have the mind-bending puck control of a Rick Nash, or the easy skating stride of a Jay Bouwmeester, or even the wicked release of a Martin Havlat or Thomas Vanek. What Horcoff does bring to the team is blazing speed, tenacious forecheck, a nose for the net, and the typical Oiler attitude of going "balls to the wall" 110% until the whistle blows to end the third period. And unlike other tenacious forecheckers like Draper or Fisher, Horcoff owns a much more desirable offensive upside, and much like other Oilers, has the ability to simplify his game when things aren't going right. However, all that being said, as much as I'd like to see Shawn Horcoff play in a Canadian jersey, I just don't think there's room for him on a roster as tight as Canada's.
Robyn Regehr - Robyn Regehr was another very difficult player to cut, because of what he can bring to the team. International experience and success, big body presence, physically intimidating with a mean streak, and positionally sound. However, there are other players who possess these attributes, and have an offensive upside to boot. Regehr, while relatively sound positionally, lacks the foot speed to keep up with quicker forwards, particularly on the big ice, and this could lead to critical breakdowns in the defensive zone coverage. He is not able to recuperate as quickly as other defenseman, and at the end of the day, he's a bit of a one dimensional player. As far as defensive defenseman go, Robyn Regehr is at the top of many people's lists, but in terms of finding a roster spot on Canada's already tight roster, there's just no room.
Brad Richards - Stanley Cup and Conn Smythe winner in 2004, part of the “big 4” in Tampa Bay, Brad Richards is arguably one of the most intelligent puck movers in the NHL, and one of the few forwards who can effectively quarterback a powerplay. Brad Richards was one of the most difficult cuts to make; his success and experience both internationally and in the NHL speaks for itself, his intelligent decision making, and his clutch ability to produce in a big way at the most crucial times under the most intense pressure make him a valuable commodity. However, with the leadership of players like Joe Sakic, Adam Foote, Jarome Iginla, Ryan Smyth, and others, his experience pales in comparison. Players like Eric Staal and Ryan Getzlaf are also intelligent puck movers, but carry with them a hard, physical edge that Richards lacks. His clutch play and two-way savvy will be missed, but on a team like Canada’s, there is only room to fill the essential gaps, which leaves Richards on the outside looking in.
Shea Weber - While many people have Shea Weber on their lists, I personally didn't select him for my team, and I'll tell you why. While he may have internation experience playing along side Dion Phaneuf at the World Juniors (as Bob McKenzie was apt to point out), and while he may bring a good, hard physical edge to the team, and while I certainly like what he brings to a team, in my opinion, he's simply too raw. Defenseman like Phillips and Bouwmeester have far greater potential as shut-down defenders, and both can skate far better than Weber. Phillips, Boyle, and Campbell are all better puck distributors than Weber, and Phillips and Bouwmeester have the potential to be equally physical, and Jovanovski and Phaneuf (along with other Canadian defenseman I selected) can play with a real mean streak and hard physical edge. There's nothing that Weber can bring to the team that hasn't already been selected for. However, we're still two years away from the Olympics, and things can change greatly from here till then. Weber, who is already the No. 1 defenceman for Nashville, still has time to develop into an elite tier defenceman, which he has the potential to do. At this point, I wouldn't take a player like Weber over players like Phillips or Bouwmeester because of their skating and puck distributing abilities, but Weber makes a strong case to be revisted in 2010.
Now for the players I took a pass on. Naturally, a strong argument can be made for any of these players; some of them people will undoubtedly wonder why they're even on my list, and for those absent, some will wonder why they didn't make the short-list. Here is my short-list of bubble players who didn't make the cut.
Daniel Briere - Briere is quick, shifty, and has the soft hands of a sniper. He is equally adept at setting up plays as finishing them, and can play under intense pressure situations. Defensively he's not a liability, offensively dangerous; on the big ice surface, his agility would be a welcome addition to Team Canada’s offence. However, while Daniel Briere brings with him an impressive skill set, each of the bubble players I’ve chosen fills a particular niche within the team. Nash brings his unbelievable stick skills and foot speed, Gagne with his speed and two-way savvy, Staal with his all-around ability, decision making, and net presence, Getzlaf with his poise, patience, and balanced play, and Spezza with his unparalleled passing and puck movement skills. While Briere is a considerable threat on offence, he is simply not able to fill those gaps to the level that these other players can.
Marc Savard - While Savard is an excellent playmaker, and prolific point getter, like Briere, there is simply no room for the skill set he brings. His skating is not as strong as Gagne or Nash, his playmaking ability is not up to the level of a Spezza, Crosby, or Thornton, and he doesn’t provide the big body presence, poise, and savvy of a Getzlaf or Gagne. While he is an invaluable asset to his club team, there is simply no room on a team as tight as Canada.
Mike Richards - Two years might seem like a country mile from here, because in that time, it might very well be impossible to cut Richards from the team. In his young career, Richards has captained the Canadian Junior team to a gold medal, brought his Junior club, the Kitchener Rangers success in the playoffs, and has quickly become an integral part of his NHL club, the Philadelphia Flyers. Seeing Mike Richards play reminds me a lot of another monstrous player for Sweden that you might recognize: Daniel Alfredsson. Richards displays plenty of poise, two-way savvy, and like the aforementioned Alfredsson, his feet never stop moving. He is currently on par to eclipse his previous season highs, and he has been referred to with reference as the future captain of his NHL club. Whether in the coming seasons he separates himself from the rest of the pack is something only time will tell, and he is certainly a case that will have to be revisited in the 09/10 season.
Brendan Shanahan - Brendan Shanahan has had immense success, both at the NHL level as well as the international level. His previous involvements with Team Canada have all been successful, and the skill set and leadership he brings to any team would be valuable indeed. However, this is no ordinary team, and these are no ordinary players. While Shanahan is still effective in the offensive zone, his skating has never really been his strongest asset, and on the big ice, strong skaters are essential to a winning team. In 2010, Shanahan will be pushing 40 years, and with the combination of age, skating ability, and his skill set, it would be impossible to fit him within the structure of the team. Shanahan, you will be missed!
Rod Brind'Amour - Yes, I had “Rod the Bod” on my short-list. Most pundits, websites, and armchair hockey fans wouldn’t even mention his name on a list as “prestigious” as the one Canadian brass looks at. However, there are a number of reasons why I think Rod Brind’Amour should at least draw significant consideration. Brind’Amour is a born leader, both vocally and by example, his faceoff skills are impressive, and he is a warrior through and through. Aside from Adam Foote, there is no player who exhibits the toughness, both physical and mental, that Rod Brind’Amour does. While he is not the fleetest of foot, or the best puck mover in the league, he is solid in both ends of the rink, an invaluable penalty killer, he is consistently effective in the faceoff circle, he has been consistently productive for the last three seasons (including this one), and his play without the puck is probably as strong or stronger than his play with the puck. However, when looking at the skill and skating level of some of the names that were taken (and even some of the names that weren’t), there just simply isn't any room for Brind'Amour and his unique skill set.
Paul Kariya - Paul Kariya, like Rod Brind’Amour, brings a very valuable and very unique skill set to his team. He’s experienced success, both internationally and in the NHL (although he hasn’t won a Cup yet), and brings with him a positive attitude and leadership skills. His experiences with Team Canada have been productive, and in the 2002 Olympic tournament, generated many quality scoring chances with his blazing speed, bullet shot, and adept finishing skills. Unfortunately, the speedy Kariya can be a one dimensional player at times, and while his foot speed will serve him and his team well on the big ice surface, he can’t open that ice up as well as players like Staal, Thornton, or Heatley. His finishing skills are admirable, but are not equalled by his passing, and many players like Getzlaf, Staal, and others present more of a balanced package, which can keep goalies a little more on their toes. While I would like nothing more than to select Kariya (if anything to represent the Asian population), he simply isn’t good enough to make the cut. And that is not a knock against Kariya, that says something about the amount of skill available to this team.
Jonathan Toews - Toews has a bright future ahead of him in the NHL, but as of now, is only in his rookie season. Even Sidney Crosby was passed over for selection in the 2006 Winter Games, and Toews, while holding vast potential, is no Sidney Crosby. There are still two years left before the 2010 games, and that may be time enough for Toews to prove his worth, but one look at the talent available for selection, and becomes abundantly clear just how high of a mountain he needs to climb. Be that as it may, he is certainly a case that will need to be revisited in two years in 2010. Best of luck, Jonathan Toews.
Shane Doan - “Doaner” as he’s known, brings another unique blend of checking, scoring, and physical presence to the team. In the 2004 world cup, he played alongside Joe Thornton and Kris Draper on a “checking line” which dominated the tournament. However, as much as I like the game that Shane Doan plays, and the skill set that he represents, unlike Ryan Getzlaf, I don’t believe it’s a skill set that will translate well onto the bigger ice surface. While both are very physical players who display two-way savvy, Getzlaf’s poise, patience, and natural flair for playing in the middle are all translatable to the larger ice surface, while Doan’s run and gun style and tight checking are more conducive to a smaller surface. It would be fun to watch how Doan adapts to the larger ice surface, but that is a luxury that these kinds of tournaments do not afford.
Brenden Morrow - Brenden Morrow brings a very similar skill set to that of Shane Doan; a physical, run-and-gun, two-way playing style which can dominate the smaller ice surface, and check opponents into the ground. Unfortunately, like Doan, this style suffers from the same drawbacks, as checking opponents becomes more difficult, particularly when speedy, puck moving forwards are given larger areas to work with. Cutting out time and space becomes more difficult, and that is a keystone to Morrow’s game; forcing offensive zone turnovers and opportunistic play.
Dan Boyle - Last of the “big 4” for Tampa Bay, Dan Boyle is slick and fast. He can make clean, crisp outlet passes, rush the puck, and quarterback the powerplay. Boyle has developed into a very balanced defenceman for both Canada and his NHL club, making him a very difficult cut. His style of play lends itself nicely to the big ice surface, but he lacks the size and international experience of other bubble players like Jovanovski and Bouwmeester. However, Boyle’s leadership qualities, foot speed, tight defensive zone coverage, ability to quickly and effectively move the puck out of the danger zones, and transition offence would be a welcome addition to the team. Boyle's direct competition would be Brian Campbell and Ed Jovanovski, who may very well be interchangeable on the team.
Rob Blake - Age has become a factor with Rob Blake, as he is just too slow. Being a “complete package” defenceman means relying heavily on skating and positioning as cornerstones of his game; both of which have never really been Blake’s strongest assets. In his younger years, he could rely a little heavier on his foot speed to get himself out of trouble, but now with the onset of age, he is a step slower, and doesn’t have that impeccable positioning to keep him out of trouble, nor the foot speed to give him the recuperative ability get him out of trouble when he gets in deep. His body is not as well conditioned as Foote or Brind’Amour, so playing into his 40’s is going to be a problem, and in short, despite his vast experience and success internationally and in the NHL, his swan song has sung, and his boat has left. Thanks for the many great years, Mr. Blake, you will be missed!
Brian Campbell - If "slickness" was a trait, Brian Campbell's got it in spades. His ability to move the puck on the powerplay and confidence with the puck are difficult to match, and he carries with him a penchant for open ice hits (apropos R.J. Umberger of the Flyers in the 05/06 playoffs and others). Unfortunately, while Campbell possesses a most desireable skill set, I had to reject Campbell for mostly the same reasons as I rejected Boyle. While he is able to do a number of things very well, there a number of Canadian defenseman who can do the same things he can do, but do them better. And while he can run the powerplay with aplomb, significantly better than a d-man like Phillips, Phillips is far tighter on the defensive zone coverage, is more physical in the defensive zone, has better recuperative ability, and makes cleaner and smarter outlet passes.
Shawn Horcoff - I know many people would not even consider Horcoff for the Canadian Olympic national team. Some of you might think that I'm adding his name on my short list just because he was selected for the All-Star team. Not so. For anyone who's seen this guy develop, they know that Horcoff brings much more to the Oilers than just being a first-line centre. The argument could be made that Horcoff doesn't have the skill to be a true top-line centre, and that argument might be justified. He doesn't have the mind-bending puck control of a Rick Nash, or the easy skating stride of a Jay Bouwmeester, or even the wicked release of a Martin Havlat or Thomas Vanek. What Horcoff does bring to the team is blazing speed, tenacious forecheck, a nose for the net, and the typical Oiler attitude of going "balls to the wall" 110% until the whistle blows to end the third period. And unlike other tenacious forecheckers like Draper or Fisher, Horcoff owns a much more desirable offensive upside, and much like other Oilers, has the ability to simplify his game when things aren't going right. However, all that being said, as much as I'd like to see Shawn Horcoff play in a Canadian jersey, I just don't think there's room for him on a roster as tight as Canada's.
Robyn Regehr - Robyn Regehr was another very difficult player to cut, because of what he can bring to the team. International experience and success, big body presence, physically intimidating with a mean streak, and positionally sound. However, there are other players who possess these attributes, and have an offensive upside to boot. Regehr, while relatively sound positionally, lacks the foot speed to keep up with quicker forwards, particularly on the big ice, and this could lead to critical breakdowns in the defensive zone coverage. He is not able to recuperate as quickly as other defenseman, and at the end of the day, he's a bit of a one dimensional player. As far as defensive defenseman go, Robyn Regehr is at the top of many people's lists, but in terms of finding a roster spot on Canada's already tight roster, there's just no room.
Brad Richards - Stanley Cup and Conn Smythe winner in 2004, part of the “big 4” in Tampa Bay, Brad Richards is arguably one of the most intelligent puck movers in the NHL, and one of the few forwards who can effectively quarterback a powerplay. Brad Richards was one of the most difficult cuts to make; his success and experience both internationally and in the NHL speaks for itself, his intelligent decision making, and his clutch ability to produce in a big way at the most crucial times under the most intense pressure make him a valuable commodity. However, with the leadership of players like Joe Sakic, Adam Foote, Jarome Iginla, Ryan Smyth, and others, his experience pales in comparison. Players like Eric Staal and Ryan Getzlaf are also intelligent puck movers, but carry with them a hard, physical edge that Richards lacks. His clutch play and two-way savvy will be missed, but on a team like Canada’s, there is only room to fill the essential gaps, which leaves Richards on the outside looking in.
Shea Weber - While many people have Shea Weber on their lists, I personally didn't select him for my team, and I'll tell you why. While he may have internation experience playing along side Dion Phaneuf at the World Juniors (as Bob McKenzie was apt to point out), and while he may bring a good, hard physical edge to the team, and while I certainly like what he brings to a team, in my opinion, he's simply too raw. Defenseman like Phillips and Bouwmeester have far greater potential as shut-down defenders, and both can skate far better than Weber. Phillips, Boyle, and Campbell are all better puck distributors than Weber, and Phillips and Bouwmeester have the potential to be equally physical, and Jovanovski and Phaneuf (along with other Canadian defenseman I selected) can play with a real mean streak and hard physical edge. There's nothing that Weber can bring to the team that hasn't already been selected for. However, we're still two years away from the Olympics, and things can change greatly from here till then. Weber, who is already the No. 1 defenceman for Nashville, still has time to develop into an elite tier defenceman, which he has the potential to do. At this point, I wouldn't take a player like Weber over players like Phillips or Bouwmeester because of their skating and puck distributing abilities, but Weber makes a strong case to be revisted in 2010.
Thursday, February 7, 2008
Vancouver 2010
It's not but two years away, and the time has come once again for the great debate of the Canadian Olympic team. Who gets the nod and who gets bumped? Will there be great surprises, or will Canadian brass go with the "usual suspects"? As always, with a list as long and as talented as the Canadians, there will always be notable omissions. Players from teams that homers feel should have gotten a second look, or young prospects that people feel should be given their due. There is never a shortage of controversy when it comes to cutting talent from a team with as much choice as Canada has, so let's break it down. Who's available (or at least, should be available) in 2010, what prospects might have made the grade by then, and who's in and who's out. Incidentally, there's a TSN web poll that you can also participate in, located at: http://tsn.ca/olympics/canadasteam/
The Goalies
The Locks:
Here's where it gets interesting. After that list of 8 forwards, 3 defense, and 2 goaltenders, that leaves a mere 5 forward positions open, 4 defense positions, and 1 available goaltender position. This to split amongst a very, very talented list of players. Here's my two cents:
So, without further philibustering, here is the long list of Canadian players that could potentially (realistically) make the team.
The Forwards
- Jason Spezza
- Vincent Lecavalier
- Joe Sakic
- Dany Heatley
- Martin St. Louis
- Ryan Smyth
- Mike Fisher
- Brad Richards
- Paul Stastny
- Marc Savard
- Nathan Horton
- Kris Draper
- Patrice Bergeron
- Brad Boyes
- Paul Kariya
- Eric Staal
- Andy McDonald
- Jason Arnott
- Rod Brind'Amour
- Justin Williams
- Rick Nash
- Sidney Crosby
- Jonathan Toews
- Jordan Staal
- Shawn Horcoff
- Joe Thornton
- Daniel Briere
- Dustin Penner
- Patrick Marleau
- Simon Gagne
- Sam Gagne
- Jonathan Cheechoo
- Jarome Iginla
- Ryan Getzlaf
- Joffrey Lupul
- Alex Tanguay
- Corey Perry
- Mike Richards
- Owen Nolan
- Chris Kunitz
- Jeff Carter
- Shane Doan
- Brenden Morrow
- Brendan Shanahan
- Pierre-Marc Bouchard
- Mike Ribeiro
- Mike Cammelleri
- Todd Bertuzzi
- Wade Redden
- Kevin Bieksa
- Kyle McLaren
- Chris Phillips
- Brent Burns
- Brian Campbell
- Robyn Regehr
- Brent Seabrook
- Braydon Coburn
- Adam Foote
- Cam Barker
- Dan Boyle
- Rob Blake
- Duncan Keith
- Jay Bouwmeester
- Philippe Boucher
- Shea Weber
- Mike Green
- Trevor Daley
- Barret Jackman
- Sheldon Souray
- Ed Jovanovski
- Chris Pronger
- Dion Phaneuf
- Francois Beauchemin
- Eric Brewer
- Adrian Aucoin
- Scott Niedermayer
- Jason Smith
- Nick Shultz
The Goalies
- Ray Emery
- Martin Biron
- Marc-Andre Fleury
- Martin Brodeur
- Cam Ward
- Roberto Luongo
- Jean-Sebastien Giguere
- Manny Legace
- Marty Turco
- Jonathan Bernier
- Mike Smith
The Locks:
No doubt some of the names on these lists will stir debate, some will have people saying, "Why is this guy even ON the list", and some will have people questioning why this guy isn't at the top of an unordered list because he's THAT good. No matter how deep and talented your stable of players is, there will always be those players that stand out so far from the pack, that it's egg on your face if you don't choose them.
Sidney Crosby - Doi. This guy is good. Unbelievably good. After a single season, and at the tender age of 20 years, "Sid the Kid" has quickly become the most coveted forward in the NHL. The pundits had him chosen as a lock for the Hart, and were it not for the high ankle sprain he suffered about two weeks ago, he would probably have gotten there. He is the complete package. Offensively explosive, defensively reliable, plays a hard, physical game without ever crossing the line, a solid team player with no ego, and a team leader to boot, both vocal and by example. Believe the hype, because with Sidney Crosby, there is no downside. None. He is the epitome of what young hockey players aspire to be, and the player every coach wants to have.
Joe Sakic - Even mentioning this guy's name on this list might have some people saying, "Huh? Won't he be 40 in 2010"? But consider this. In the past 20 years or so, besides the name "Steve Yzerman", is there another name in the league that has commanded the level of respect as the name "Joe Sakic"? In some places, and with some people, the name is spoken with reverence. Small countries in Europe have erected shrines in his honour, and worship him as a deity. Okay, maybe not that far... but his accomplishments speak for themselves. 9th in all-time NHL scoring points, 11th in all-time assists, 14th in all-time goals, six 100+ point seasons, has averaged 1.2 points per game over 1300+ career games, is first overall amongst active players in scoring points (1611), one of the longest serving captains of one team (17 years), winner of the Hart and Conn Smythe trophies, member of the triple gold club, tournament MVP on the gold medal winning 2002 Canadian team, two Stanley Cups, destined for the Hall of Fame. Will he be 40 years old in 2010? Sure he will. Will he still be able to contribute to the team. You better believe it. While Joe Sakic is getting a little older, his consistency of play, his leadership skills, and the commanding presence he brings into the dressing room are things that could never be replaced. If Team Canada leaves for Vancouver without Joe Sakic (who was incidentally born in Burnaby, B.C.), they'll be worse off for it, I guarantee it.
Joe Thornton - Aside from Sidney Crosby and Jason Spezza, Joe Thornton is likely the best playmaker in the league. His big body presence up the middle, unparalled vision, and utter domination down low will be an invaluable asset in opening up the big ice surface for his teammates. While he's not the fastest skater on the team, nor the most vocal team leader, his ability to focus on the task at hand, play through the pain, lack of any sort of ego, and personality that will accept any role given to him without complaint will be a boon to the Canadian team. Mike O'Connell, GM of the Boston Bruins possibly made the worst trade in history by trading away Joe Thornton (who went on to win the Hart and Art Ross trophies that year). Mike Milbury possibly one-upped him (retrospectively) by trading Zdeno Chara and 1st round pick (Jason Spezza) for Alexei Yashin. Fortunately, neither Mike Milbury, nor Mike O'Connell will be running Team Canada.
Vincent Lecavlier - An offensive dynamo. Unbelievably creative with eyes in the back of his head, hands like velvet, an emergent leader, and a temper like quicksilver. Vincent Lecavalier will create space for his team, run the powerplay, and has the potential to turn defenders inside-out. One of the most complete offensive players in the league; for those not entirely in tune with his talents before his breakout, his numbers have begun to speak for themselves. A Team Canada without Lecavalier is like a Sundae without icecream.
Martin St. Louis - Like Lecavalier, he is also part of "the big 3" (now "the big 4" with the inclusion of Dan Boyle). Martin St. Louis may be small, but his heart is as big, and shines as brightly as the sun. Slick, shifty, and tight in the corners, coupled with an attitude that refuses to back down from any challenge, physical or mental, St. Louis leads by example. Penalty kill, powerplay, big ice, NHL ice, checking or scoring, it doesn't matter to St. Louis who he's playing against, who he's playing with, how much ice time he gets, or what role he's given. Martin St. Louis will give 110% every time, every game, every shift. Even if you've never heard of Martin St. Louis, that's as much as you need to know.
Jarome Iginla - Possibly the happiest guy in the league, Jarome Iginla brings an upbeat, positive attitude, zero ego, and a never quit attitude to compliment a lethal shot, powerful skating stride, and physical dominance. A true triggerman, Iginla lives in the slot, and from there, he can be one of the most dangerous players in the NHL. Amongst powerfowards, Iginla is amonst the best. On the Calgary Flames, he is the heart and soul. Jarome Iginla will never quit, he will never stop, he will always inspire, and he will be a constant menace on offense.
Dany Heatley - One of the most dangerous players in the NHL in the offensive zone, Dany Heatley is as good as setting up as he is at finishing. While not as creative as players like Sidney Crosby or Vincent Lecavalier, his shot is as hard as it is accurate, and his one-timer is amongst the best in the league. Physically big and strong, he's as dangerous in the slot as he is in front of the net as he is from the half-boards, and just to further confound defenders, he's just as likely to pass as he is to shoot.
Ryan Smyth - Nicknamed "Captain Canada", when Canada calls, Ryan Smyth will answer, even if he's only got one leg to stand on. The only player to possibly rival St. Louis in terms of sheer will, Ryan Smyth lives and thrives on effort. While not the most flashy, creative, or physically dominant player in the league, there is no player in the league that will sacrifice more for his team than Ryan Smyth. His epic battles, goals scored, and punishment received in front of the opposing net have been made into inspiring ballads by some bard living in some remote country watching Edmonton games on television. (As a matter of fact, of his 281 career NHL goals, 280 of them were probably scored from within five feet of the goal line). There is no player in the league that battles as hard as Ryan Smyth, night in and night out. He creates goals out of sheer will. His ability to simplify the game has been a blessing on his team on innumerable occasions. He leads by voice and by example, and his tenacity is unmatched. Even for a player unpossessing of a skillset like Ryan Smyth's, that kind of dedication is impossible to ignore.
Scott Niedermayer - Four Stanley Cups on two different teams, gold medal winner, Norris trophy winner, Conn Smythe trophy winner, Scott Niedermayer has done one thing over his career, and that is win. As smooth a skater as there has ever been, a slick puck mover, powerplay quarterback, stalwart defender, vocal team leader, and a consumate professional who never gets rattled; Scott Niedermayer does it all. The only question about Scott Niedermayer's involvement with Team Canada is, if he retires in the next couple years, how hard will Canadian brass have to beg him to get him to come back?
Chris Pronger - Big, strong, and physical with a wicked mean streak, great reach, a bullet shot from the point, the ability to quarterback a powerplay, and the ability to log a tonne of minutes. His accolades include a Norris trophy, a Hart trophy, a gold medal, a Stanley Cup in 2007, and almost single-handedly carrying Edmonton on his shoulders during their Cup run to the finals in 2006; what left is there to say? Pronger is the complete package, and everything a coach could ask for in a blueliner. Throw away all those bulky old one-dimensional players. With Chris Pronger, your satisfaction is guaranteed, or your money back!
Adam Foote - Surprised? It would be no surprise that many people would not have this man on their lists. However, take this into consideration. For the past decade, Adam Foote has been a stalwart defender for Canada. While he will be 38 come 2010, Adam Foote remains as tough as nails, and I would challenge anyone to find a player in the NHL that's tougher (and I'm not referring to enforcers). This guy eats nails for breakfast. I've seen him do it. He may be getting a little older, but his positioning is still as uncanny as ever, he's virtually impossible to beat one-on-one, and he's seemingly immune to breakdowns in defensive coverage. There is not a Canadian defenceman who has more experience or has experienced as much success, both internationally and in the NHL, than Adam Foote (except for possibly Scott Niedermayer). That experience and leadership, both vocal and by example, will not only be an invaluable asset to the team, but more importantly to the younger members of the Team Canada's blueline.
Martin Brodeur - I won't even bother going through the reasons why Martin Brodeur should be included on this list, or the accolades he's accumulated over the years. To Team Canada, Martin Brodeur is Martin Brodeur. Sure, he'll be 38 come 2010, but he's also Martin Brodeur; arguably one of the greatest goaltenders in the history of the NHL. He makes his biggest saves at the most crucial of times under the most intense pressure. A true clutch performer, in the big games, there's no one better.
The Supporting Cast:
Here's where it gets interesting. After that list of 8 forwards, 3 defense, and 2 goaltenders, that leaves a mere 5 forward positions open, 4 defense positions, and 1 available goaltender position. This to split amongst a very, very talented list of players. Here's my two cents:
Jason Spezza - One of the most skilled forwards in the NHL, if he could ever play a complete season, with the points per game he acquires year in and year out, he could realistically compete for the Art Ross every year. While he may be defensively weak, and he may not be as fleet of foot as some of the speedier players, his vision and passing skills are unparalleled, rivaling or perhaps even surpassing those of Sidney Crosby or Joe Thornton. He commands fantastic stick handling skills, the soft hands of a sniper, and long reach which he often uses to his advantage. On the powerplay, there may not be a better centre in the league.
Simon Gagne - Perhaps the least offensive threat from the thirteen forwards, Simon Gagne brings much more to the table than being an offensive menace. His international experience with Team Canada and his leadership role on the Flyers are both important contributing ingredients to a winning team. His speed and creativity will open up ice for his teammates, his finishing polish and quick release make him offensively capable, and his two-way savvy will be a boon on the penalty kill. These things, along with Gagne's previous international involvement with Team Canada make him a tough cut.
Eric Staal - Tall and lanky with a nose for the net, Eric Staal is a constant menace on offense. Great long reach, a natural goal scorer, leadership qualities, a mean streak, and one of the very few forwards in the league who can effectively quarterback a powerplay. Eric Staal has a desirable skill set, and one which will give the coach heaps more options than he would otherwise. But perhaps what sets Eric Staal apart from the rest of the pack is his intelligent decision making with and without the puck. It is this decision making that always has Staal in the right place at the right time, and it is this intelligence that allows him to safely quarterback the powerplay. With Eric Staal in the lineup, the coach will have some very tasty options at his disposal.
Rick Nash - Another tall powerforward with long reach similar to Staal, but unlike Staal, Nash brings something very different to the table. While he is not as defensively responsible as some of his Canadian peers, or is not as adept a playmaker as he is a finisher, his smooth, effortless skating stride, long reach, mindbending one-on-one ability and puck control, and undeniable offensive intelligence make him possibly the most dangerous player in the tournament on the big international ice surface. While he has yet to produce up to his potential in the NHL, his skill is irrefutable, and on that merit alone, Nash is a virtual lock. He's that good.
Ryan Getzlaf - Another controversial pick, I'm sure, but consider what Ryan Getzlaf can bring to the team. While he's not as fast a skater and does not possess the one-on-one puck possession of a Rick Nash, he brings a skill set could be considered more suited to a smaller ice surface, but could be equally effective on the big ice under the right circumstances. A big body presence up the middle, competent and capable in all three zones, can play effectively 5-on-5, on the powerplay, or on the penalty kill, can make clean, crisp, tape-to-tape passes, and is equally fluent at finishing as he is at creating plays and passing. He plays with the poise and patience of a veteran ten years his senior, and while he possesses a vicious mean streak, will rarely allow the opposition to rattle his cage. Calm, cool, and polished in all three zones, Getzlaf will bring a very balanced skill set to the team.
Jay Bouwmeester - The only player in the league who can make skating look as effortless as Scott Niedermayer. Bouwmeester moves faster than any big man in the league, and while he hasn’t broken out of his offensive shell yet, he’s an intelligent blueliner who makes smart decisions with the puck. Turnovers in his own end are rare, he’s tight on the defensive coverage, excellent one-on-one defender, and amazing recuperative ability; crisp and clean outlet passes, the ability to lead the rush, and smart pinching. Combine these offensive and defensive traits along with the ability to log a tonne of minutes (30+ on many nights), and Jay Bouwmeester is one of the most balanced defenseman in the league. His potential as a shut-down defender, and balanced ability to play under any circumstance will add heaps of options to a coach’s arsenal.
Chris Phillips - Another terrific skater, although while not possessing as effortless a stride as Bouwmeester or Niedremayer, he remains one of the quicker big men in the league. Strong on the body, tight on the defensive zone coverage, long reach, which he often uses to his advantage, and can execute the outlet pass with aplomb. In the defensive zone, Phillips is one of the best defenseman in the league. While his acumen in the offensive zone leaves something to be desired, his ability to quickly and cleanly move the puck out of danger, his recuperative ability, his consistency and intelligent decision making, leadership skills, and his strong body presence in the defensive zone make him an invaluable asset to Canada’s defense.
Dion Phaneuf - Some have dared make the comparison between Phaneuf and the incomparable Scott Stevens in terms of his ability to make bone-crushing open ice hits, and in many respects, the comparison is justified. While he may not be up to the level of Scott Stevens yet, Dion Phaneuf is well on his way. While his defensive zone coverage is not as tight as other defenseman, and his outlet passes are not crisp and clean as players like Pronger, Niedermayer, Boyle, or Campbell, in terms of sheer intimidation, there is no one better. His ability to line up hits and intimidate the opposition with his physical presence and canon from the point will keep the opposition with their heads on a swivel, and prevent them from daring to cut into the middle. His intimidating presence will keep forwards honest and help the team both mentally, and on the score sheet, and his ability to walk the line will open up shooting and passing lanes on the powerplay.
Ed Jovanovski - There are few enough “complete package” defenseman in the league, and Ed Jovanovski is one of them. His vicious mean streak and physical presence can intimidate opponents, and his offensive acumen allows him to make smart outlet passes, make timely and smart pinches in the offensive zone without hurting his team, and quarterback a power play. Ed Jovanovski brings a very desirable skill set to his team, as like many of the premier “complete package” defenseman, he can do many of the things a “specialist” can do, and on many occasions, he can do them better.
Cam Ward - Considering that the third goalie on Team Canada will be relegated to playing maybe one game in the round robin (and even that's not very likely), particularly in light of the fact that he's backing up Roberto Luongo and Martin Broduer, both of whom are not only considered by many to be the best goalies in the league, but also play over 70+ games on their club teams, the choice of third goaltender is relatively inconsequential. Nonetheless, a team is a team, and in a case like this, the best choice is a goaltender with a positive team attitude, and maybe one with a future with the idea to give him international experience for future tournaments. Cam Ward is an excellent young goaltender with a mature attitude, and a potential for future Team Canada starts. While Turco and Giguere are also great goaltenders, why not give the kid some international experience. Even if he won't see a single game (which is very likely), the experience of travelling overseas with a team as strong as Canada's to compete in a foreign country on a stage as big as the Olympics will be the experience of a lifetime. And for a goaltender with a future as bright as Ward's, why not?
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Our Beloved Maple Leafs
Leaf Nation... I use the term loosely as a term for a physical, geographical area which is defined by broadcast television coverage. In short, if you're forced by your regional sports coverage to watch the Toronto Maple Leafs every single game, you're probably in Leaf Nation. Leaf Nation is not a good place to be. It's full of blind zealots, something akin to a cult, who follow the will and behest of their ruling overmind, Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment. Leaf Nation is the perfect example of how media is able to control what people think, and when they deem it appropriate to think it. Take, for example, the telecast of the Feb. 5 broadcast of the Panthers/Leafs game. It started off with ominous music, followed by the narration of Joe Bowen stating that the young Leaf prospects were finally reaching the potential Leaf management thought they would, and that they were "showing why they were chosen".
Of course, for any pundit out there not affiliated with MLSE, we know that the Toronto Maple Leafs HAVE NO PROSPECTS. They were referring to Jiri Tlusty, chosen in the 1st round, 13th overall, Robbie Earl, chosen in the 6th round, 187th overall, and Carlo Colaiacovo, chosen in the 1st round, 17th overall. However, if one were to delve a little deeper past what MLSE is trying to sell, one would notice that their top prospect, Jiri Tlusty has 8 points in 30 games, and is a -8 with 4 PIMS. Given he's only 19 years old, but those are not exactly impressive numbers. Robbie Earl, who after ONE game has become the saviour of the Leaf franchise, and has 30 points in 67 games in the AHL Toronto Marlies. Impressive, no? Finally, we come to Carlo Colaiacovo, who after four seasons, has played a grand total of 81 NHL games, is 25 years old, and has a bit of a mountain to climb to catch up to a real prospect like, oh I don't know... Dion Phaneuf, Brent Burns, or Ryan Whitney.
But relax everyone in Leaf Nation. Everything is going to be okay... Shhhh.... It's okay... *said in cooing voice* Robbie Earl will save you. Robbie Earl will make it allll better. And if he doesn't, then Bryan McCabe will. Or maybe 25 year old "prospect" Carlo Colaiacovo. Shhhhh... Don't worry about a thing... Shhhhhhhh..........
Of course, for any pundit out there not affiliated with MLSE, we know that the Toronto Maple Leafs HAVE NO PROSPECTS. They were referring to Jiri Tlusty, chosen in the 1st round, 13th overall, Robbie Earl, chosen in the 6th round, 187th overall, and Carlo Colaiacovo, chosen in the 1st round, 17th overall. However, if one were to delve a little deeper past what MLSE is trying to sell, one would notice that their top prospect, Jiri Tlusty has 8 points in 30 games, and is a -8 with 4 PIMS. Given he's only 19 years old, but those are not exactly impressive numbers. Robbie Earl, who after ONE game has become the saviour of the Leaf franchise, and has 30 points in 67 games in the AHL Toronto Marlies. Impressive, no? Finally, we come to Carlo Colaiacovo, who after four seasons, has played a grand total of 81 NHL games, is 25 years old, and has a bit of a mountain to climb to catch up to a real prospect like, oh I don't know... Dion Phaneuf, Brent Burns, or Ryan Whitney.
But relax everyone in Leaf Nation. Everything is going to be okay... Shhhh.... It's okay... *said in cooing voice* Robbie Earl will save you. Robbie Earl will make it allll better. And if he doesn't, then Bryan McCabe will. Or maybe 25 year old "prospect" Carlo Colaiacovo. Shhhhh... Don't worry about a thing... Shhhhhhhh..........
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)